The Talmud Condones Pedophilia and is Wholly Evil
Objection: So the charge is that the Talmud supports pedophilia and is wholly “evil”. Some specific Talmudic passages are cited that do seem to support this contention. These include Sanhedrin 54b and 55b where there are discussions about girls under the age of 3, boys under the age of 9 and intercourse. Original texts can be found at Chabad.org. Does the Talmud really condone pedophilia?
​
Answer: The Babylonian Talmud (started in the 3rd century CE and completed around 500 CE) is a foundational text of Rabbinic Judaism, compiling centuries of legal debates, interpretations of biblical law (halakha), ethical discussions, and hypothetical scenarios. Tractate Sanhedrin focuses on courts, punishments, and capital crimes, including forbidden sexual relations derived from Leviticus (e.g., adultery, incest, bestiality, and homosexuality). Sections 54b and 55b specifically address the legal thresholds for liability in such acts—defining when an act counts as "full-fledged intercourse" under biblical law, which affects punishments like execution (in an ancient context requiring witnesses, warnings, and a functioning Sanhedrin court).
​
These passages use stark, hypothetical language about minors because the Talmud is a record of rabbinic debates, not a prescriptive guide. Just as a side note, this is one of the reasons why in Matthew 7:28-29 it says “When Jesus had finished these words, the crowds were amazed at His teaching; 29 for He was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.” And not like the rabbis. The Talmud explores edge cases to clarify boundaries, similar to how modern legal texts discuss hypotheticals (e.g., age of consent in criminal law). The ages mentioned (3 for girls, 9 for boys) are not endorsements but markers for when an act triggers certain legal statuses, often to protect the minor from stigma or liability. Importantly, the Talmud elsewhere explicitly discourages child betrothal or consummation (e.g., Kiddushin 41a forbids marrying off young daughters; Sanhedrin 76b urges waiting until puberty). Modern Jewish law universally prohibits child marriage and sexual relations with minors, aligning with civil laws.
​
Are these disturbing sorts of discussions? Yes they are and would it have been preferable if the rabbis focused more on being clearer on overall prohibitions and not on the minutia of fine points of law? Yes, but it is also not appropriate for these passages to be used to say the Talmud promotes pedophilia. This is not what is happening in these discussions. These are truly debates on fine points of law to determine that if this happens then who is responsible, who is liable, as mentioned above. Additionally, these passages make up the tiniest fraction of the thousands of pages that are the Talmud. Not to mention that they are over 1500 years old and come from a different time and a different culture. This makes them hard for modern people to be able to understand the true context and purpose of these discussions. But it is not the promotion of pedophilia.
​
Here is some additional background information and opportunities for further research:
Key Content and Rabbinic Explanations Sanhedrin 54b: Focus on Male Minors and Liability for Homosexual Intercourse. This page debates interpretations of Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, which prescribe death for male homosexual acts ("You shall not lie with a male as with a woman"). The discussion clarifies that only acts between consenting adults (or where both are liable) trigger mutual punishment. For minors:
-
Core Debate (54b:19-23): A baraita (teaching) states: "With regard to intercourse with a male, the Torah does not deem a younger boy to be like an older boy; but with regard to intercourse with a female, the Torah does deem a younger girl to be like an older girl." Rav and Shmuel differ on thresholds: Rav sets 9 years for boys (acts under 9 aren't "real" intercourse, so the adult alone is liable); Shmuel sets 3 years.
-
Explanation: This is not permitting sex with children. It's determining when the child incurs biblical liability (e.g., execution, which never applied to minors anyway). Below age thresholds, the child's act lacks legal weight—like a minor can't consent or be culpable in modern courts—so the adult bears full guilt. The goal is to shield the victim: "If an adult rapes a boy less than 9, the sin is entirely on the adult—the child is guiltless."
quora.com
This protects the child's status (e.g., no lifelong stigma as a "perpetrator"). Rabbinic commentators like Rashi emphasize it's about halakhic (legal) validity, not biology or permission.
-
Alternative to Misinterpretation: Antisemitic claims twist this as "Jews may have sex with boys under 9."
antisemiticlies.com
But the text assumes the act is forbidden; it debates consequences. No rabbinic authority ever read it as license—it's a harm-reduction framework in a pre-modern era where child vulnerability was rampant.
Sanhedrin 55b: Focus on Female Minors, Betrothal, and Virgin Status. This page continues from 54b, shifting to forbidden relations with females (e.g., adultery) and bestiality. It uses a mishna from Niddah (on menstrual impurity) to resolve debates:
-
Core Statement (55b:4): "A girl who is three years and one day old whose father arranged her betrothal is betrothed by intercourse... and if her yavam [levirate husband] cohabits with her, she acquires him." (Yavam refers to a brother-in-law marrying a widow under levirate law, Deuteronomy 25.)
-
Explanation: In ancient times, betrothal (kiddushin) could occur via contract, money, or intercourse—but only after puberty for consummation (nissuin). Fathers could betroth young daughters for economic/security reasons (common globally, including in Christian Europe until the 19th century). The "3 years and one day" threshold defines when intercourse legally validates betrothal (e.g., making her "married" for inheritance) or affects virginity status for priests' wives (kohanim). Below 3, it "doesn't count"—protecting her from impurity or marriage invalidation if assaulted.
judaism.stackexchange.com +1
The passage assumes paternal consent in a hypothetical betrothal; it doesn't advocate consummation. Rav forbids it outright (Kiddushin 41a: "One should not betroth his daughter when she is young"), viewing it as harmful.
myjewishlearning.com
Commentaries like Tosafot stress this is theoretical, for rare cases like assault recovery (e.g., a raped minor retains "virgin" status for future marriage).
-
Alternative to Misinterpretation: Claims of "permitting sex with 3-year-olds" ignore context—it's about legal fiction to aid victims, not endorsement.
judaism.stackexchange.com
The Talmud frames child betrothal as a "bitter harm-reduction measure" against exploitation, not ideal practice.
thelehrhaus.com
Broader Rabbinic Consensus and Modern Application
-
Discouragement of Child Marriage: Sanhedrin 76a-b mandates waiting until puberty (around 12 for girls) for any union, as earlier risks health and consent issues. Yevamot 107a calls early betrothal a "fence" against abuse but regrets it.
-
Prohibition on Abuse: Sexual relations with minors are biblical violations (e.g., "do not stand idly by blood," Leviticus 19:16). Punishments apply only to adults; children are victims.
-
Historical Context: These debates reflect a 2nd-5th century world with high child mortality and arranged marriages. Rabbis mitigated harms, not promoted them—unlike some contemporary cultures.
-
Today: All Jewish denominations ban child marriage/sex. Orthodox poskim (authorities) cite these texts to condemn abuse, emphasizing consent and maturity (e.g., Shulchan Aruch, Even HaEzer 37:8 requires puberty).
simpletoremember.com
For full text, see Sefaria.org (English/Hebrew with commentaries). If studying Talmud, resources like My Jewish Learning or Chabad.org offer guided explanations.
​
These are additional resources that can be used for further research with explanations.
sexuality - Does the talmud promote pedophilia? - Mi Yodeya
21 Talmud Facts Every Jew Should Know - Chabad.org
This is where you can see the original text at issue in translation and also an apologetic.
Niddah 44b:13 with Connections – actual text
talmud gemara - Apologetics for marriage at 3 years old - Mi Yodeya